RAUM vs. Miro:
The Spatial Alternative
for Complex Collaboration
vs.
When should you switch?
Miro is ideal for simple whiteboards. RAUM is the solution for teams that want to master complexity. If you want to not just place content but understand and develop it together in a 3D context, RAUM gives you the decisive edge.
Why teams look for a Miro alternative
Miro is the standard for getting started with visual work. But as projects grow, many teams hit an invisible limit: the 2D ceiling.
- The problem: Flat boards quickly become overwhelming at high complexity.
- The result: Users spend more time “searching and zooming” than actually understanding.
- The turning point: When you notice your team is only managing content instead of working through it together, it’s time for a spatial approach.
The fundamental difference: Whiteboard vs. workspace
Switching from Miro to RAUM isn’t a feature upgrade—it’s a paradigm shift.
- Miro (The whiteboard): An endless but flat surface. Everything happens on one plane.
- RAUM (The environment): A three-dimensional context. Here, size, distance, and depth become strategic tools that make structure intuitively tangible.
Feature comparison:
RAUM vs. Miro at a glance
| Aspect | Miro (2D Standard) | RAUM (3D innovation) |
|---|---|---|
| Working principle | Static whiteboard | Dynamic 3D environment |
| Focus | Documentation & moderation | Exploration & co-creation |
| Complexity | Quickly becomes overwhelming | Scales naturally through depth |
| Sense of presence | Abstract (cursor tracking) | Realistic co-presence |
| Persistence | Ephemeral boards | Lasting digital twins |
| Hardware | Browser & desktop | VR, desktop & high-end streaming |
When Miro remains the right choice
Miro is unbeatable for quick, async alignment and simple visual planning. If your goal is just a digital sticky-note collection or a short brainstorming session, a 2D whiteboard is the most efficient solution.
Why RAUM wins when complexity grows
RAUM comes into its own where the whiteboard gives up. It’s the tool for teams that want real synergy.
1. Less need to explain—context does the work
In RAUM, spatial arrangement already carries about 50% of the information. Because objects have a physical relationship to each other, team members grasp connections intuitively without lengthy written explanation.
2. Focus instead of clutter
While Miro boards often turn into a busy “Where’s Waldo” view, RAUM offers a focused working atmosphere. Teams report:
- More structured discussions thanks to spatial separation of topics.
- Faster decision-making because scenarios are “walkable.”
- Real closeness: the feeling of actually being in one place boosts engagement significantly.
Conclusion: Making the digital space productive
RAUM is the Miro alternative for teams that have outgrown the board. If you only want to collect, use the whiteboard. If you want to think, develop, and experience together, RAUM gives you the space.
The alternative to Miro when a whiteboard is no longer enough.